In Atomfall, the Core i5-3350P is slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3350P
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 69 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3350P vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3350P vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3350P vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3350P
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3350P Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
69 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
