In Atomfall, the Core i5-3350P is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3350P
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 69 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 40% faster in Atomfall – 266 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3350P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3350P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3350P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3350P
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3350P Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
69W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
