In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7400T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $121 more expensive!
Core i5-3330
No clear advantages
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 67 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 61% cheaper – $78.02 vs $199.00
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.16 vs $3.26/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3330 vs Core i5-7400T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
92%
Price, $
$199
39%
Value, $/FPS
$3.26/FPS
36%
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
67 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3330 vs Core i5-7400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3330 vs Core i5-7400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3330 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
