In The First Descendant, the Core i5-3330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7400T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $121 more expensive!
Core i5-3330
No clear advantages
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 2% faster in The First Descendant – 112 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The First Descendant
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 61% cheaper – $78.02 vs $199.00
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in The First Descendant – $0.69 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in The First Descendant
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
The First Descendant FPS Calculator
Core i5-3330 vs Core i5-7400T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
110 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
95%
Price, $
$199
39%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
38%
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
112 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
81 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3330 vs Core i5-7400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3330 vs Core i5-7400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3330 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
