In Rust, the Core i5-3320M is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $316 cheaper!
Core i5-3320M
- Up to 83% cheaper – $65.05 vs $380.99
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Rust – $0.31 vs $1.61/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 13% faster in Rust – 236 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
66%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
65%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
