Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F and the more expensive Core i5-13400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-13400F - 241 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $405.00 vs $849.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-13400F - $1.68 vs $3.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 583 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 583 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |