The Core i5-11600KF is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7302 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $670.06 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-11600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 80% cheaper – $169.89 vs $839.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 125 vs 155 Watts
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Core i5-11600KF vs EPYC 7302
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
150
100%
Price, $
$169.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600KF vs EPYC 7302 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600KF vs EPYC 7302 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600KF vs EPYC 7302 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-11600KF | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $237.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Rome |
125 W | Power Consumption | 155 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 12 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
