The Core i5-11600 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700T, however, it's the same value for money, as it's $61.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-11600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- Up to 44% cheaper – $79.00 vs $140.00
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-6700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
152
100%
Price, $
$140
56%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
62%
Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-6700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-11600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |