In Atomfall, the Core i5-10600KF is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $411 cheaper!
Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 73% cheaper – $149.00 vs $559.99
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $2.28/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600KF vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
216 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
88%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
26%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600KF vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600KF vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
