In Ready or Not, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $390 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 74% cheaper – $139.55 vs $529.95
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Ready or Not – $0.44 vs $1.58/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Ready or Not
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 6% faster in Ready or Not – 334 vs 316 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Ready or Not
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Ready or Not FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
316 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
72%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
334 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
28%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
