In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-10400F is slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $390 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 74% cheaper – $139.55 vs $529.95
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – $1.35 vs $4.10/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 25% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 129 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
103 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
76 FPS
78%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
26%
Value, $/FPS
$4.1/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
