In Atomfall, the Core i3-9100 is slightly faster than the Core i5-3340M. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $116 more expensive!
Core i3-9100
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 68% cheaper – $54.04 vs $169.95
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall – $0.28 vs $0.81/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-3340M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
35%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
189 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
91%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-3340M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-3340M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100 Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
