In Atomfall, the Core i5-3340M is slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $140 cheaper!
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 72% cheaper – $54.04 vs $194.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Atomfall – $0.28 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-3340M vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
75%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
36%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3340M vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3340M vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
63%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
