In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i3-9100 is faster than the Core i3-3220T and it's also a better value for money, as it's $20 cheaper!
Core i3-9100
- Up to 18% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 124 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 11% cheaper – $169.95 vs $189.95
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Ghost of Tsushima – $1.37 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Ghost of Tsushima
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
105 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
77%
Price, $
$189.95
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
76%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100 Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
