In F1 24, the Core i3-9100 is slightly faster than the Core i3-3220T and it's also a better value for money, as it's $20 cheaper!
Core i3-9100
- Up to 6% faster in F1 24 – 153 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in F1 24
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 11% cheaper – $169.95 vs $189.95
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in F1 24 – $1.11 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in F1 24
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
F1 24 FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
153 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
115 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
144 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
108 FPS
94%
Price, $
$189.95
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
85%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100 Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
