In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i9-7980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7980XE
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 months and 27 days newer – Sep 01, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 months and 27 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i9-7980XE: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i9-7980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i9-7980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i9-7980XE
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7980XE Sep 1st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
