In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i5-430M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 201 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Core i5-430M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-430M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-430M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-430M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-430M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
