In Atomfall, the Core i3-6100 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $493 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 87% cheaper – $70.65 vs $563.41
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall – $0.34 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
203 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
82%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
12%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
