In Atomfall, the Core i3-6100 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $498 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 88% cheaper – $70.65 vs $569.00
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall – $0.34 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 51 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 267 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
76%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
267 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
200 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
12%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
