In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $377 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 84% cheaper – $70.65 vs $447.16
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.39 vs $2.63/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
179 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
95%
Price, $
$447.16
15%
Value, $/FPS
$2.63/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
