In Atomfall, the Core i3-6100 is slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $368 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 84% cheaper – $70.65 vs $438.99
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Atomfall – $0.34 vs $1.77/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
203 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
82%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.99
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
