In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Core i7-8700 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $81 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 180 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 53% cheaper – $70.65 vs $151.63
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.39 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
177 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
98%
Price, $
$151.63
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
