In Atomfall, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $76 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 52% cheaper – $70.65 vs $146.40
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall – $0.34 vs $0.70/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
203 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
98%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$146.4
48%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
