In Atomfall, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $299 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 81% cheaper – $70.65 vs $369.99
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall – $0.34 vs $1.54/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-13700
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-13700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
203 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
84%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$369.99
19%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
