In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $310 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 180 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 81% cheaper – $70.65 vs $380.99
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.39 vs $2.22/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
95%
Price, $
$380.99
18%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
