In Rust, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $278 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper – $70.65 vs $349.00
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Rust – $0.32 vs $1.47/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 236 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
79%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
