In Atomfall, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Core i5-4460. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $7 more expensive!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs May 11, 2014
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 51 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Core i5-4460
- Up to 9% cheaper – $64.04 vs $70.65
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 9% better value in Atomfall – $0.31 vs $0.34/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-4460: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
91%
Core i5-4460
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
202 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
99%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-4460 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-4460 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4460
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4460 May 11th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | May 11th, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $187.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
