In Deathloop, the Core i3-4170 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $581 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 85% cheaper – $98.95 vs $679.99
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $2.55/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 54 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 68% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Up to 22% faster in Deathloop – 266 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
82%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$679.99
14%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
