In Deathloop, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $269 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 73% cheaper – $98.95 vs $367.99
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $1.46/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 54 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Up to 16% faster in Deathloop – 252 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
87%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
189 FPS
100%
Price, $
$367.99
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7800X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $449.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
