Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Core i3-3240
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $41.00 vs $378.72
- Up to 83% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.41 vs $2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 62% better in New World than Core i3-3240 - 160 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 24 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7189 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
17%
Price, $
$378.72
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $378.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7189 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |