Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Core i3-3240
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $41.00 vs $332.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-14700K - $0.22 vs $1.44 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than Core i3-3240 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 28 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
15%
Price, $
$332.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $332.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |