The Core i3-3240 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $180.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-3240
- Up to 58% cheaper – $128.99 vs $308.99
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-11900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-11900KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
183
82%
Min 1% FPS
127
84%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
152
100%
Price, $
$308.99
41%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
51%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-11900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-11900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $513.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
