In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220T is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $111 more expensive!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core i7-6700T
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 58% cheaper – $79.00 vs $189.95
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.44 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-6700T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
41%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
47%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
179 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
88%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
