In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220T is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $200 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 51% cheaper – $189.95 vs $389.95
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.95 vs $2.28/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
86%
Price, $
$389.95
48%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
