In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Core i7-4710MQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 17 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i7-4710MQ
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 201 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 months and 12 days newer – Apr 14, 2013 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 months and 12 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-4710MQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-4710MQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-4710MQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4710MQ
Apr 14th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4710MQ Apr 14th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Apr 14th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $378.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGAG3 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
