In Atomfall, the Core i7-4710MQ is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 14, 2013
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710MQ vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710MQ vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710MQ vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710MQ
Apr 14th, 2013
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
6 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710MQ Apr 14th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 14th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
