In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3210 is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $410 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 72% cheaper – $159.00 vs $569.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.78 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 55 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$569
27%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
