In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3210 is faster than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $296 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 65% cheaper – $159.00 vs $454.99
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.78 vs $2.59/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 55 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Nov 07, 2024 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Nov 7th, 2024
Average FPS
175 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$454.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Nov 7th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 9800X3D Nov 7th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 7th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $479.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
