In Rust, the Core i3-3210 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $71 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 31% cheaper – $159.00 vs $229.89
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 9% better value in Rust – $0.75 vs $0.82/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 279 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
210 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
46%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
279 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
91%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
