In Rust, the Core i3-3210 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $231 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 59% cheaper – $159.00 vs $389.95
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Rust – $0.76 vs $1.34/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 55 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Up to 39% faster in Rust – 290 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
42%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
290 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$389.95
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
