The Core i3-3210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4790K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $28.49 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 55 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-4790K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 18% cheaper – $130.51 vs $159.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-4790K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4790K
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$130.51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-4790K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-4790K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-4790K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4790K
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4790K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Not Available | MSRP | $350.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
55 W | Power Consumption | 88 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |