In Rust, the Core i3-3210 is slower than the Core i5-11600KF and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $8 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 5% cheaper – $159.00 vs $167.00
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 19% faster in Rust – 248 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 12% better value in Rust – $0.67 vs $0.76/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
208 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
59%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
88%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $237.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
