In F1 25, the Core i3-3210 is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $49 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 24% cheaper – $159.00 vs $208.37
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in F1 25 – $0.92 vs $1.11/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in F1 25
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 9% faster in F1 25 – 187 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in F1 25
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
172 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
92%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.37
76%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
83%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $237.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
