Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3877 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 43% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3110M - 139 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-3110M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
