Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4155 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3110M - 206 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |