In Deathloop, the Core i3-2130 is slightly slower than the FX-6100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i3-2130
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
FX-6100
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 month and 7 days newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 1 month and 7 days newer
- Up to 60% cheaper – $33.90 vs $84.91
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Deathloop – $0.15 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-2130 vs FX-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2130
Sep 4th, 2011
Average FPS
222 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
99%
Price, $
$84.91
39%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
39%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2130 vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2130 vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2130
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2130 Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM3+ |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
