In Deathloop, the FX-6100 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $642 cheaper!
FX-6100
- Up to 95% cheaper – $33.90 vs $675.59
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Deathloop – $0.15 vs $2.53/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 95 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Up to 19% faster in Deathloop – 266 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-6100 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
84%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$675.59
5%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
6%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
95W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
