Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $139.99 vs $500.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.14 vs $3.60 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10320 - 139 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $500.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |