Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $139.99 vs $432.98
- Up to 63% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900K - $1.14 vs $3.07 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10320 - 141 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
37%
Price, $
$432.98
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |