In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4820K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105T
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-4820K
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-4820K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
194 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
94%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
